Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: Move insn if/else into do_check_insn()
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-05-01 18:22:58
Also in:
bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, lkml
On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 09:35 +0200, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
This is required to catch the errors later and fall back to a nospec if on a speculative path. Eliminate the regs variable as it is only used once and insn_idx is not modified in-between the definition and usage. Still pass insn simply to match the other check_*() functions. As Eduard points out [1], insn is assumed to correspond to env->insn_idx in many places (e.g, __check_reg_arg()). Move code into do_check_insn(), replace * "continue" with "return 0" after modifying insn_idx * "goto process_bpf_exit" with "return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT" * "do_print_state = " with "*do_print_state = " [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/293dbe3950a782b8eb3b87b71d7a967e120191fd.camel@gmail.com/ (local) Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <redacted> Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <redacted> Cc: Maximilian Ott <redacted> Cc: Milan Stephan <redacted> ---
Except two notes below, I think this patch looks good. Thank you, this is a good refactoring. [...]
+static int do_check_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ bool *do_print_state)
+{[...]
+ } else if (class == BPF_ST) {
+ enum bpf_reg_type dst_reg_type;
+
+ if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM ||
+ insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0) {
+ verbose(env, "BPF_ST uses reserved fields\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ /* check src operand */
+ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ dst_reg_type = cur_regs(env)[insn->dst_reg].type;Implicitly relying on `insn == &env->prog->insnsi[env->cur_idx]` is weird. Still think that `insn` parameter should be dropped and computed inside this function instead.
+
+ /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
+ err = check_mem_access(env, env->insn_idx, insn->dst_reg,
+ insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code),
+ BPF_WRITE, -1, false, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = save_aux_ptr_type(env, dst_reg_type, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ } else if (class == BPF_JMP || class == BPF_JMP32) {[...]
+ } else if (opcode == BPF_EXIT) {
+ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != BPF_K ||
+ insn->imm != 0 ||
+ insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 ||
+ insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 ||
+ class == BPF_JMP32) {
+ verbose(env, "BPF_EXIT uses reserved fields\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+process_bpf_exit_full:Nit: since we are refactoring I'd extract this as a function instead of goto.
+ /* We must do check_reference_leak here before
+ * prepare_func_exit to handle the case when
+ * state->curframe > 0, it may be a callback function,
+ * for which reference_state must match caller reference
+ * state when it exits.
+ */
+ err = check_resource_leak(env, exception_exit, !env->cur_state->curframe,
+ "BPF_EXIT instruction in main prog");
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /* The side effect of the prepare_func_exit which is
+ * being skipped is that it frees bpf_func_state.
+ * Typically, process_bpf_exit will only be hit with
+ * outermost exit. copy_verifier_state in pop_stack will
+ * handle freeing of any extra bpf_func_state left over
+ * from not processing all nested function exits. We
+ * also skip return code checks as they are not needed
+ * for exceptional exits.
+ */
+ if (exception_exit)
+ return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT;
+
+ if (env->cur_state->curframe) {
+ /* exit from nested function */
+ err = prepare_func_exit(env, &env->insn_idx);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ *do_print_state = true;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_0, "R0");
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT;[...]