Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 14 authors, 2024-12-09

Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-15 23:20:47
Also in: ath11k, ceph-devel, cocci, dri-devel, intel-xe, linux-block, linux-bluetooth, linux-mm, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linux-sound, linux-staging, linux-wireless, live-patching, lkml, netdev, netfilter-devel, xen-devel

On Fri, Nov 15 2024 at 14:15, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
On 11/15/2024 1:41 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
quoted
How do you expect this series to land since it overlaps a large number of
maintainer trees? Do you have a maintainer who has volunteered to take the
series and the maintainers should just ack? Or do you want the maintainers to
take the individual patches that are applicable to them?

/jeff
I am hoping for tglx to take it through his tree since the patch
introducing secs_to_jiffies() is in his tree, so sequencing of
dependencies would not be an issue.
Right, but it's two days before the merge window opens, so no.
But if tglx won't, we could push it out another cycle and individual
maintainers can take the patches that are applicable to their tree for
the series.
That's the easiest way forward as it does not create conflicts and all
maintainers will have the base patch in their trees after rc1.

Thanks,

        tglx
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help