On 11/15/2024 1:29 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:

On 11/15/2024 1:26 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:

quoted

This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
Coccinelle. This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
that use the multiply pattern of either of:
- msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
- msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)

The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.

CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <redacted>

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030-open-coded-timeouts-v3-0-9ba123facf88@linux.microsoft.com/ (local)
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8734kngfni.fsf@somnus/ (local)

---
Changes in v2:
- EDITME: describe what is new in this series revision.
- EDITME: use bulletpoints and terse descriptions.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v1-0-19aadc34941b@linux.microsoft.com (local)

Apologies, I missed out on editing the changelog here. v1 included a
patch that's already been accepted, there are no other changes in v2.

Thanks,
Easwar

How do you expect this series to land since it overlaps a large number of
maintainer trees? Do you have a maintainer who has volunteered to take the
series and the maintainers should just ack? Or do you want the maintainers to
take the individual patches that are applicable to them?

/jeff