Re: [PATCH v4 18/29] arm64: add POE signal support
flat view
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Date: 2024-07-25 16:00:24
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm
Hi, On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 02:01:36PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add PKEY support to signals, by saving and restoring POR_EL0 from the stackframe. Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Szabolcs Nagy <redacted> --- arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 7 ++++ arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h index 8a45b7a411e0..e4cba8a6c9a2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -980,6 +1013,13 @@ static int setup_sigframe_layout(struct rt_sigframe_user_layout *user, return err; } + if (system_supports_poe()) { + err = sigframe_alloc(user, &user->poe_offset, + sizeof(struct poe_context)); + if (err) + return err; + } + return sigframe_alloc_end(user); }@@ -1020,6 +1060,15 @@ static int setup_sigframe(struct rt_sigframe_user_layout *user, __put_user_error(current->thread.fault_code, &esr_ctx->esr, err); } + if (system_supports_poe() && err == 0 && user->poe_offset) { + struct poe_context __user *poe_ctx = + apply_user_offset(user, user->poe_offset); + + __put_user_error(POE_MAGIC, &poe_ctx->head.magic, err); + __put_user_error(sizeof(*poe_ctx), &poe_ctx->head.size, err); + __put_user_error(read_sysreg_s(SYS_POR_EL0), &poe_ctx->por_el0, err); + } +
Does the AArch64 procedure call standard say anything about whether POR_EL0 is caller-saved? <bikeshed> In theory we could skip saving this register if it is already POR_EL0_INIT (which it often will be), and if the signal handler is not supposed to modify and leave the modified value in the register when returning. The complexity of the additional check my be a bit pointless though, and the the handler might theoretically want to change the interrupted code's POR_EL0 explicitly, which would be complicated if POE_MAGIC is sometimes there and sometimes not. </bikeshed> [...] Cheers ---Dave