Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/topology: Check if a core is online
From: Nysal Jan K.A. <hidden>
Date: 2024-06-25 06:13:35
Also in:
lkml
From: Nysal Jan K.A. <hidden>
Date: 2024-06-25 06:13:35
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:36:33AM GMT, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
quoted
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu) #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT #include <linux/cpu_smt.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>Is this header file needed? I don't see any reference to cpumask related code.
cpu_online() is defined in that header.
quoted
#include <asm/cputhreads.h> static inline bool topology_is_primary_thread(unsigned int cpu)@@ -156,6 +157,18 @@ static inline bool topology_smt_thread_allowed(unsigned int cpu) { return cpu_thread_in_core(cpu) < cpu_smt_num_threads; } +This is defined only if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT is true. But this could be generic function which might be used to check if a core is offline in other cases. Would that make sense to keep it out of CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT ?
I'm not opposed to the idea, it would also be easy to do that later if there is another consumer of this function. Regards --Nysal