Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2023-06-20 12:18:58
Also in:
lkml
zhumao001@208suo.com writes:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Delete repeated word in comment. Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <redacted> --- drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c index 50b0c44bb8d7..6957946a6463 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ int cxl_attach_dedicated_process_psl9(structcxl_context *ctx, u64 wed, u64 amr) * Ideally we should do a wmb() here to make sure the changes to the * PE are visible to the card before we call afu_enable. * On ppc64 though all mmios are preceded by a 'sync' instruction hence - * we dont dont need one here. + * we dont need one here.
I know the rule is to only do one change per patch, but if you're fixing the wording of a comment you can absolutely fix the spelling at the same time. So please send a v2 with "dont" spelt correctly. cheers