Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word
From: Frederic Barrat <hidden>
Date: 2023-06-20 07:44:43
Also in:
lkml
Hello, While the correction in the comment is of course ok, the patch was sent as html. You may want to check/fix how it was submitted. Fred On 18/06/2023 17:08, zhumao001@208suo.com wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Delete repeated word in comment. Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <zhumao001@ 208suo. com> --- drivers/misc/cxl/native. c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native. c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native. cindex ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!2k-hI76VihO6WgXx-IHFLxDVOAL2DdWMKjPu4ApiehtDXYjNrTR1Cj6nYDmD8SP9M8AZ7TpWUloL0Ixn_2IX60uI2MsuBkM$> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Delete repeated word in comment. Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <redacted> --- drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c index 50b0c44bb8d7..6957946a6463 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ int cxl_attach_dedicated_process_psl9(structcxl_context *ctx, u64 wed, u64 amr) * Ideally we should do a wmb() here to make sure the changes to the * PE are visible to the card before we call afu_enable. * On ppc64 though all mmios are preceded by a 'sync' instruction hence - * we dont dont need one here. + * we dont need one here. */ result = cxl_ops->afu_reset(afu);