[PATCH 04/10] watchdog/hardlockup: In watchdog_hardlockup_check() use cpumask_copy()

From
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date
2023-05-27 01:42:55
Also in
linux-perf-users, lkml, sparclinux
Reply to
Douglas Anderson, 2023-05-27
In the patch ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to
watchdog_hardlockup_check()") we started using a cpumask to keep track
of which CPUs to backtrace. When setting up this cpumask, it's better
to use cpumask_copy() than to just copy the structure directly. Fix this.

Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---

 kernel/watchdog.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 32dac8028753..85f4839b6faf 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -154,7 +154,9 @@ void watchdog_hardlockup_check(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 */
 	if (is_hardlockup(cpu)) {
 		unsigned int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
-		struct cpumask backtrace_mask = *cpu_online_mask;
+		struct cpumask backtrace_mask;
+
+		cpumask_copy(&backtrace_mask, cpu_online_mask);
 
 		/* Only print hardlockups once. */
 		if (per_cpu(watchdog_hardlockup_warned, cpu))
-- 
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog
Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 2 authors, last reply 2023-06-01
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help