Re: [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/rtas: fix miswording in rtas_function kerneldoc
From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-23 00:18:59
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:33 -0600, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Nathan Lynch <redacted> The 'filter' member is a pointer, not a bool; fix the wording accordingly. Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c index c73b01d722f6..c29c38b1a55a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct rtas_filter {* functions are believed to have no users on * ppc64le, and we want to keep it that way. It does * not make sense for this to be set when @filter - * is false. + * is NULL. */ struct rtas_function { s32 token;
-- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited