On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 23/3/23 18:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
Replace open-coded implementations of pci_resource_n() in pci.h.
...
quoted
#define pci_resource_n(dev, bar) (&(dev)->resource[(bar)])
-#define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].start)
-#define pci_resource_end(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].end)
-#define pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].flags)
-#define pci_resource_len(dev,bar) \
- ((pci_resource_end((dev), (bar)) == 0) ? 0 : \
- \
- (pci_resource_end((dev), (bar)) - \
- pci_resource_start((dev), (bar)) + 1))
+#define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) (pci_resource_n(dev, bar)->start)
+#define pci_resource_end(dev, bar) (pci_resource_n(dev, bar)->end)
+#define pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) (pci_resource_n(dev, bar)->flags)
+#define pci_resource_len(dev,bar) \
+ (pci_resource_end((dev), (bar)) ? \
+ resource_size(pci_resource_n((dev), (bar))) : 0)
Seems (to me) more logical to have this patch as "PCI: Introduce
pci_resource_n()" ordered before your patch #2 "PCI: Introduce
pci_dev_for_each_resource()".
Either way works for me. Bjorn, what do you like?
Here as #6 or as #2:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <redacted>
Thank you!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko