Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax)
From: Sedat Dilek <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-15 12:05:02
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel
From: Sedat Dilek <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-15 12:05:02
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 1:27 AM Matthew Wilcox [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:28:30PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:quoted
[ ... ]quoted
Best is to ask the Debian release-team or (if there exist) maintainers or responsibles for the IA64 port - which is an ***unofficial*** port.Here we go: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/ Posting address: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Found via <https://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html>More useful perhaps is to look at https://popcon.debian.org/ There are three machines reporting popcon results. It's dead.
Exactly, Debian Popularity Contest was what I was looking for yesterday. Thanks Matthew. [1] says in Inst (204701): Name || Number || % ================================== binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu || 101548 || 49.61% binutils-ia64-linux-gnu || 11 || 0.01% HELP: Inst. is the number of people who installed this package (sum of the four categories below) There may be more popular packages than binutils. ( binutils might tell something about development happening or not. ) Anyway, I am not a popcon expert and never participated in Debian's Popularity Contest. -Sedat- [1] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=binutils