Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax)

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2023-01-13
RE: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> · 2023-01-13
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2023-01-13
ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> · 2023-01-13
RE: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> · 2023-01-13
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Jessica Clarke <hidden> · 2023-01-13
RE: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> · 2023-01-13
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Jessica Clarke <hidden> · 2023-01-13
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> · 2023-01-13
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> · 2023-01-13
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Sedat Dilek <hidden> · 2023-01-14
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Sedat Dilek <hidden> · 2023-01-14
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2023-01-15
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Sedat Dilek <hidden> · 2023-01-15
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> · 2023-01-16
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> · 2023-01-16
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2023-01-16
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> · 2023-01-16
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> · 2023-01-16
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> · 2023-01-16
Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) · Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> · 2023-01-16
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Mateusz Guzik <hidden> · 2023-01-13
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2023-01-13
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> · 2023-01-13
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com> · 2023-01-13
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2023-01-13
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com> · 2023-01-13
Memory transaction instructions · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-01-16
Re: Memory transaction instructions · Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> · 2023-01-16
Re: Memory transaction instructions · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2023-01-16
Re: Memory transaction instructions · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2023-01-18
Re: Memory transaction instructions · "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com> · 2023-01-19
Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> · 2023-01-13
[PATCH] lockref: stop doing cpu_relax in the cmpxchg loop · Mateusz Guzik <hidden> · 2023-01-13
RE: [PATCH] lockref: stop doing cpu_relax in the cmpxchg loop · "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> · 2023-01-13
Re: [PATCH] lockref: stop doing cpu_relax in the cmpxchg loop · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2023-01-13

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2023-01-15 00:27:26
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:28:30PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:

[ ... ]

quoted

Best is to ask the Debian release-team or (if there exist) maintainers
or responsibles for the IA64 port - which is an ***unofficial*** port.

Here we go:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/

Posting address: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org

Found via <https://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html>

More useful perhaps is to look at https://popcon.debian.org/

There are three machines reporting popcon results.  It's dead.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help