Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 3 authors, 2023-02-14

Re: [PATCH v2 00/33] Per-VMA locks

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2023-01-27 22:51:46
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:40:37 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan [off-list ref] wrote:
Per-vma locks idea that was discussed during SPF [1] discussion at LSF/MM
last year [2], which concluded with suggestion that “a reader/writer
semaphore could be put into the VMA itself; that would have the effect of
using the VMA as a sort of range lock. There would still be contention at
the VMA level, but it would be an improvement.” This patchset implements
this suggested approach.
I think I'll await reviewer/tester input for a while.
The patchset implements per-VMA locking only for anonymous pages which
are not in swap and avoids userfaultfs as their implementation is more
complex. Additional support for file-back page faults, swapped and user
pages can be added incrementally.
This is a significant risk.  How can we be confident that these as yet
unimplemented parts are implementable and that the result will be good?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help