On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:14:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
FWIW, there have been some objtool patches for arm64 stack validation,
but the arm64 maintainers have been hesitant to get on board with
objtool, as it brings a certain maintenance burden. Especially for the
full stack validation and ORC unwinder. But if you only want inline
static calls and/or mcount then it'd probably be much easier to
maintain.
IIRC the major stumbling block for arm64 is the whole jump-table thing.
Either they need to rely on compiler plugins to provide objtool that
data (yuck, since we support at least 2 different compilers), disable
jump-tables (yuck, for that limits code-gen just to please a tool) or
use DWARF (yuck, because build times).
Well yeah, that was indeed the main technical issue but I seem to
remember some arm64 maintainers not really being sold on the value of
objtool regardless.
There was a little talk about an impromptu 'abi' to communicate
jump-table details to objtool without going full on DWARF, but that
seems to have hit a dead end again.
Probably my fault, not enough hours in the day...
--
Josh