Thread (59 messages) 59 messages, 6 authors, 2021-12-08

Re: [patch V2 20/23] PCI/MSI: Move msi_lock to struct pci_dev

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2021-12-08 15:29:33
Also in: ath11k, linux-hyperv, linux-mips, linux-pci, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel

On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:27:56PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
It's only required for PCI/MSI. So no point in having it in every struct
device.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
---
V2: New patch
---
 drivers/base/core.c    |    1 -
 drivers/pci/msi/msi.c  |    2 +-
 drivers/pci/probe.c    |    4 +++-
 include/linux/device.h |    2 --
 include/linux/pci.h    |    1 +
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
 
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -2875,7 +2875,6 @@ void device_initialize(struct device *de
 	device_pm_init(dev);
 	set_dev_node(dev, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
-	raw_spin_lock_init(&dev->msi_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->msi_list);
 #endif
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->links.consumers);
--- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int pci_msi_ignore_mask;
 
 static noinline void pci_msi_update_mask(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 clear, u32 set)
 {
-	raw_spinlock_t *lock = &desc->dev->msi_lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t *lock = &to_pci_dev(desc->dev)->msi_lock;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!desc->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask)
It looks like most of the time this is called by an irq_chip, except
for a few special cases list pci_msi_shutdown()

Is this something that should ideally go away someday and use some
lock in the irq_chip - not unlike what we've thought is needed for
IMS?

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help