Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 8 authors, 2021-09-24

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Date: 2021-09-21 17:05:09
Also in: amd-gfx, dri-devel, kexec, kvm, linux-efi, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml, platform-driver-x86

On 9/20/21 2:23 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:36PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c
index 470b20208430..eff4d19f9cb4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
  #include <linux/kernel.h>
  #include <linux/mm.h>
  #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
+#include <linux/cc_platform.h>
  
  #include <asm/setup.h>
  #include <asm/sections.h>
@@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp)
  	unsigned long pgtable_area_len;
  	unsigned long decrypted_base;
  
-	if (!sme_active())
+	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
  		return;
  
  	/*
This change break boot for me (in KVM on Intel host). It only reproduces
with allyesconfig. More reasonable config works fine, but I didn't try to
find exact cause in config.
Looks like instrumentation during early boot. I worked with Boris offline 
to exclude arch/x86/kernel/cc_platform.c from some of the instrumentation 
and that allowed an allyesconfig to boot.

Thanks,
Tom
Convertion to cc_platform_has() in __startup_64() in 8/8 has the same
effect.

I believe it caused by sme_me_mask access from __startup_64() without
fixup_pointer() magic. I think __startup_64() requires special treatement
and we should avoid cc_platform_has() there (or have a special version of
the helper). Note that only AMD requires these cc_platform_has() to return
true.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help