Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2021-08-17 18:39:07
Also in: amd-gfx, dri-devel, kexec, kvm, linux-efi, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml, platform-driver-x86
Reply to: Tom Lendacky, 2021-08-17

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:22:52AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:

I can change it to be an AMD/HYGON check...  although, I'll have to check
to see if any (very) early use of the function will work with that.

We can always change it later if really needed. It is just that I'm not
a fan of such "preemptive" changes.

At a minimum, the check in arch/x86/kernel/head64.c will have to be
changed or removed. I'll take a closer look.

Yeah, sme_me_mask, already discussed on IRC.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
[PATCH v2 01/12] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-14
[PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features · Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-14
Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-14
Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features · Christoph Hellwig · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-19
[PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-14
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-15
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-15
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Christoph Hellwig · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() · Christoph Hellwig · 2021-08-24
[PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has() · Michael Ellerman · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has() · Christoph Hellwig · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-19
[PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
[PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
[PATCH v2 07/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has() · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
[PATCH v2 08/12] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has() · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
[PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Borislav Petkov · 2021-08-17
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-17
[PATCH v2 10/12] x86/sev: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
[PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
[PATCH v2 12/12] s390/mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function · Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
Tom Lendacky · 2021-08-13
View all 45 messages

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread / next series-diff position
`k`	previous message in thread / previous series-diff position
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help