On 8/17/21 3:35 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:23AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:

quoted

Introduce a powerpc version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will
be used to replace the powerpc mem_encrypt_active() implementation, so
the implementation will initially only support the PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT
attribute.

Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig     |  1 +
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ce55c2c7e534
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/protected_guest.h

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ *
+ * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
+#define _POWERPC_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
+
+#include <asm/svm.h>
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__

Same thing here. Pls audit the whole set whether those __ASSEMBLY__
guards are really needed and remove them if not.

Will do.

Thanks,
Tom

Thx.