Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features

From
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date
2021-07-28 13:19:18
Also in
amd-gfx, kexec, kvm, linux-efi, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml, platform-driver-x86
Reply to
Tom Lendacky, 2021-07-27
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:04PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
In prep for other protected virtualization technologies, introduce a
generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), that can be used to check
for specific protection attributes, like memory encryption. This is
intended to eliminate having to add multiple technology-specific checks
to the code (e.g. if (sev_active() || tdx_active())).
So common checks obviously make sense, but I really hate the stupid
multiplexer.  Having one well-documented helper per feature is much
easier to follow.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+#define PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT		0	/* Encrypted memory */
+#define PATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT		1	/* Host encrypted memory */
+#define PATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT		2	/* Guest encrypted memory */
+#define PATTR_GUEST_PROT_STATE		3	/* Guest encrypted state */
The kerneldoc comments on these individual helpers will give you plenty
of space to properly document what they indicate and what a (potential)
caller should do based on them.  Something the above comments completely
fail to.
Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 9 authors, last reply 2021-08-13
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help