Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 10 authors, 2021-06-09

Re: [PATCH v2] lockdown,selinux: avoid bogus SELinux lockdown permission checks

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2021-05-27 14:19:07
Also in: bpf, linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml, netdev, selinux

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:33 AM James Morris [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2021, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
quoted
Thanks, Michael!

James/Paul, is there anything blocking this patch from being merged?
Especially the BPF case is causing real trouble for people and the
only workaround is to broadly allow lockdown::confidentiality in the
policy.
It would be good to see more signoffs/reviews, especially from Paul, but
he is busy with the io_uring stuff.
Yes, it's been a busy week with various things going on around here.
I looked at the v1 posting but haven't had a chance yet to look at v2;
I promise to get to it today, but it might not happen until later
tonight.
Let's see if anyone else can look at this in the next couple of days.
-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help