Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
From: Saravana Kannan <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-20 19:52:52
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM Saravana Kannan [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:28 AM Michael Walle [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
[RESEND, fat-fingered the buttons of my mail client and converted all CCs to BCCs :(] Am 2021-01-20 20:02, schrieb Saravana Kannan:quoted
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 6:24 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:53 AM Michael Walle [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
fw_devlink will defer the probe until all suppliers are ready. We can't use builtin_platform_driver_probe() because it doesn't retry after probe deferral. Convert it to builtin_platform_driver().If builtin_platform_driver_probe() doesn't work with fw_devlink, then shouldn't it be fixed or removed?I was actually thinking about this too. The problem with fixing builtin_platform_driver_probe() to behave like builtin_platform_driver() is that these probe functions could be marked with __init. But there are also only 20 instances of builtin_platform_driver_probe() in the kernel: $ git grep ^builtin_platform_driver_probe | wc -l 20 So it might be easier to just fix them to not use builtin_platform_driver_probe(). Michael, Any chance you'd be willing to help me by converting all these to builtin_platform_driver() and delete builtin_platform_driver_probe()?If it just moving the probe function to the _driver struct and remove the __init annotations. I could look into that.Yup. That's pretty much it AFAICT. builtin_platform_driver_probe() also makes sure the driver doesn't ask for async probe, etc. But I doubt anyone is actually setting async flags and still using builtin_platform_driver_probe().
And thanks for agreeing to help! -Saravana