Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] ftrace: Fix updating FTRACE_FL_TRAMP
From: Naveen N. Rao <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-01 13:48:04
Also in:
lkml
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 23:38:38 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On powerpc, kprobe-direct.tc triggered FTRACE_WARN_ON() in ftrace_get_addr_new() followed by the below message: Bad trampoline accounting at: 000000004222522f (wake_up_process+0xc/0x20) (f0000001) The set of steps leading to this involved: - modprobe ftrace-direct-too - enable_probe - modprobe ftrace-direct - rmmod ftrace-direct <-- trigger The problem turned out to be that we were not updating flags in the ftrace record properly. From the above message about the trampoline accounting being bad, it can be seen that the ftrace record still has FTRACE_FL_TRAMP set though ftrace-direct module is going away. This happens because we are checking if any ftrace_ops has the FTRACE_FL_TRAMP flag set _before_ updating the filter hash. The fix for this is to look for any _other_ ftrace_ops that also needs FTRACE_FL_TRAMP.I'm applying this now and sending this for -rc and stable. The code worked on x86 because x86 has a way to make all users use trampolines, so this was never an issue (everything has a trampoline). I modified the kernel so that x86 would not create its own trampoline (see the weak function arch_ftrace_update_trampoline(), and I was able to reproduce the bug.
Good to know that you were able to reproduce this.
I'm adding:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a124692b698b0 ("ftrace: Enable trampoline when rec count returns back to one")That looks good to me. Thanks for picking the two patches and for your review on the others! - Naveen