Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 4 authors, 2020-09-18

Re: [PATCH 03/15] selftests/seccomp: mips: Define SYSCALL_NUM_SET macro

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-18 22:00:05
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, lkml

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:55:46PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:08:08AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
Remove the mips special-case in change_syscall().

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 1c83e743bfb1..02a9a6599746 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1742,6 +1742,13 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_poke, getpid_runs_normally)
 # define ARCH_REGS		struct pt_regs
 # define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs)	(_regs).regs[2]
 # define SYSCALL_SYSCALL_NUM	regs[4]
+# define SYSCALL_NUM_SET(_regs, _nr)			\
+	do {						\
+		if ((_regs).regs[2] == __NR_O32_Linux)	\
+			(_regs).regs[4] = _nr;		\
+		else					\
+			(_regs).regs[2] = _nr;		\
+	} while (0)
I think that

# define SYSCALL_NUM_SET(_regs, _nr)				\
	do {							\
		if (SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) == __NR_O32_Linux)	\
			(_regs).regs[4] = _nr;			\
		else						\
			(_regs).regs[2] = _nr;			\
	} while (0)

would read better but that's just a matter of taste. :)
That's how I started originally, but when I realized that I'd have to
reorganize SYSCALL_NUM() too, it seem best to have minimal churn, so I
left it open coded here, since that's how it needs to be in the end.
Looks good!
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <redacted>
Thanks for the reviews!

-- 
Kees Cook
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help