Re: [PATCH 03/15] selftests/seccomp: mips: Define SYSCALL_NUM_SET macro
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-18 22:00:05
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, lkml
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-18 22:00:05
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, lkml
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:55:46PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:08:08AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
Remove the mips special-case in change_syscall(). Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 1c83e743bfb1..02a9a6599746 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c@@ -1742,6 +1742,13 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_poke, getpid_runs_normally) # define ARCH_REGS struct pt_regs # define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) (_regs).regs[2] # define SYSCALL_SYSCALL_NUM regs[4] +# define SYSCALL_NUM_SET(_regs, _nr) \ + do { \ + if ((_regs).regs[2] == __NR_O32_Linux) \ + (_regs).regs[4] = _nr; \ + else \ + (_regs).regs[2] = _nr; \ + } while (0)I think that # define SYSCALL_NUM_SET(_regs, _nr) \ do { \ if (SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) == __NR_O32_Linux) \ (_regs).regs[4] = _nr; \ else \ (_regs).regs[2] = _nr; \ } while (0) would read better but that's just a matter of taste. :)
That's how I started originally, but when I realized that I'd have to reorganize SYSCALL_NUM() too, it seem best to have minimal churn, so I left it open coded here, since that's how it needs to be in the end.
Looks good! Acked-by: Christian Brauner <redacted>
Thanks for the reviews! -- Kees Cook