Re: [merge] Build failure selftest/powerpc/mm/pkey_exec_prot
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2020-08-04 12:25:50
Subsystem:
kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
Sandipan Das [off-list ref] writes:
On 04/08/20 6:38 am, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
Sandipan Das [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 03/08/20 4:32 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
Sachin Sant [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
On 02-Aug-2020, at 10:58 PM, Sandipan Das [off-list ref] wrote: On 02/08/20 4:45 pm, Sachin Sant wrote:quoted
pkey_exec_prot test from linuxppc merge branch (3f68564f1f5a) fails to build due to following error: gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror -DGIT_VERSION='"v5.8-rc7-1276-g3f68564f1f5a"' -I/home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include -m64 pkey_exec_prot.c /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h ../harness.c ../utils.c -o /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/pkey_exec_prot In file included from pkey_exec_prot.c:18: /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:34: error: "SYS_pkey_mprotect" redefined [-Werror] #define SYS_pkey_mprotect 386 In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31, from /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/utils.h:47, from /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:12, from pkey_exec_prot.c:18: /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition # define SYS_pkey_mprotect __NR_pkey_mprotect commit 128d3d021007 introduced this error. selftests/powerpc: Move pkey helpers to headers Possibly the # defines for sys calls can be retained in pkey_exec_prot.c orI am unable to reproduce this on the latest merge branch (HEAD at f59195f7faa4). I don't see any redefinitions in pkey_exec_prot.c either.I can still see this problem on latest merge branch. I have following gcc version gcc version 8.3.1 20191121What libc version? Or just the distro & version?Sachin observed this on RHEL 8.2 with glibc-2.28. I couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 20.04 and Fedora 32 and both these distros are using glibc-2.31.OK odd. Usually it's newer glibc that hits this problem. I guess on RHEL 8.2 we're getting the asm-generic version? But that would be quite wrong if that's what's happening.If I let GCC dump all the headers that are being used for the source file, I always see syscall.h being included on the RHEL 8.2 system. That is the header with the conflicting definition. $ cd tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm $ gcc -H -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror -DGIT_VERSION='"v5.8-rc7-1456-gf59195f7faa4-dirty"' \ -I../include -m64 pkey_exec_prot.c ../../kselftest_harness.h ../../kselftest.h ../harness.c ../utils.c \ -o pkey_exec_prot 2>&1 | grep syscall On Ubuntu 20.04 and Fedora 32, grep doesn't find any matching text. On RHEL 8.2, it shows the following. ... /usr/include/sys/syscall.h .... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31, /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31, /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1575: note: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31, /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1579: note: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/include/bits/syscall.h .. /usr/include/sys/syscall.h ... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h /usr/include/bits/syscall.h .. /usr/include/sys/syscall.h ... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h /usr/include/bits/syscall.h So utils.h is also including /usr/include/sys/syscall.h for glibc versions older than 2.30 because of commit 743f3544fffb ("selftests/powerpc: Add wrapper for gettid") :)
Haha, of course. :facepalm_emoji:
[...]
. ../include/pkeys.h
[...]
.. ../include/utils.h
[...]
... /usr/include/sys/syscall.h
.... /usr/include/asm/unistd.h
.... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
In file included from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
../include/pkeys.h:34: error: "SYS_pkey_mprotect" redefined [-Werror]
#define SYS_pkey_mprotect 386
In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31,
from ../include/utils.h:47,
from ../include/pkeys.h:12,
from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
/usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition
# define SYS_pkey_mprotect __NR_pkey_mprotectAha, that explains why redefining gives us an error, because we're defining it to the literal 386 whereas the system header is defining it to the __NR value. Is there a reason to use the SYS_ name? Typically we just use the __NR value directly, and that would avoid any problems with redefinition I think, as long as we're using the same value as the system header (which we always should be). eg:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
index 6ba95039a034..3312cb1b058d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ #define SI_PKEY_OFFSET 0x20 -#define SYS_pkey_mprotect 386 -#define SYS_pkey_alloc 384 -#define SYS_pkey_free 385 +#define __NR_pkey_mprotect 386 +#define __NR_pkey_alloc 384 +#define __NR_pkey_free 385 #define PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY 2 #define NR_PKEYS 32
@@ -62,17 +62,17 @@ void pkey_set_rights(int pkey, unsigned long rights) int sys_pkey_mprotect(void *addr, size_t len, int prot, int pkey) { - return syscall(SYS_pkey_mprotect, addr, len, prot, pkey); + return syscall(__NR_pkey_mprotect, addr, len, prot, pkey); } int sys_pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long rights) { - return syscall(SYS_pkey_alloc, flags, rights); + return syscall(__NR_pkey_alloc, flags, rights); } int sys_pkey_free(int pkey) { - return syscall(SYS_pkey_free, pkey); + return syscall(__NR_pkey_free, pkey); } int pkeys_unsupported(void)
cheers