Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 3 authors, 2020-08-04

Re: [merge] Build failure selftest/powerpc/mm/pkey_exec_prot

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2020-08-04 12:25:50
Subsystem: kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers: Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds

Sandipan Das [off-list ref] writes:
On 04/08/20 6:38 am, Michael Ellerman wrote:
quoted
Sandipan Das [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On 03/08/20 4:32 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:
quoted
Sachin Sant [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
On 02-Aug-2020, at 10:58 PM, Sandipan Das [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/08/20 4:45 pm, Sachin Sant wrote:
quoted
pkey_exec_prot test from linuxppc merge branch (3f68564f1f5a) fails to
build due to following error:

gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror -DGIT_VERSION='"v5.8-rc7-1276-g3f68564f1f5a"' -I/home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include  -m64    pkey_exec_prot.c /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h ../harness.c ../utils.c  -o /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/pkey_exec_prot
In file included from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
/home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:34: error: "SYS_pkey_mprotect" redefined [-Werror]
#define SYS_pkey_mprotect 386

In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31,
                from /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/utils.h:47,
                from /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:12,
                from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
/usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition
# define SYS_pkey_mprotect __NR_pkey_mprotect

commit 128d3d021007 introduced this error.
selftests/powerpc: Move pkey helpers to headers

Possibly the # defines for sys calls can be retained in pkey_exec_prot.c or
I am unable to reproduce this on the latest merge branch (HEAD at f59195f7faa4).
I don't see any redefinitions in pkey_exec_prot.c either.
I can still see this problem on latest merge branch.
I have following gcc version

gcc version 8.3.1 20191121
What libc version? Or just the distro & version?
Sachin observed this on RHEL 8.2 with glibc-2.28.
I couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 20.04 and Fedora 32 and both these distros
are using glibc-2.31.
OK odd. Usually it's newer glibc that hits this problem.

I guess on RHEL 8.2 we're getting the asm-generic version? But that
would be quite wrong if that's what's happening.
If I let GCC dump all the headers that are being used for the source file, I always
see syscall.h being included on the RHEL 8.2 system. That is the header with the
conflicting definition.

  $ cd tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm
  $ gcc -H -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror -DGIT_VERSION='"v5.8-rc7-1456-gf59195f7faa4-dirty"' \
        -I../include -m64 pkey_exec_prot.c ../../kselftest_harness.h ../../kselftest.h ../harness.c ../utils.c \
        -o pkey_exec_prot 2>&1 | grep syscall

On Ubuntu 20.04 and Fedora 32, grep doesn't find any matching text.
On RHEL 8.2, it shows the following.
  ... /usr/include/sys/syscall.h
  .... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
  In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31,
  /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31,
  /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1575: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31,
  /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1579: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
  .. /usr/include/sys/syscall.h
  ... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
  /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
  .. /usr/include/sys/syscall.h
  ... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
  /usr/include/bits/syscall.h

So utils.h is also including /usr/include/sys/syscall.h for glibc versions older than 2.30
because of commit 743f3544fffb ("selftests/powerpc: Add wrapper for gettid") :)
Haha, of course. :facepalm_emoji:
[...]
. ../include/pkeys.h
[...]
.. ../include/utils.h
[...]
... /usr/include/sys/syscall.h
.... /usr/include/asm/unistd.h
.... /usr/include/bits/syscall.h
In file included from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
../include/pkeys.h:34: error: "SYS_pkey_mprotect" redefined [-Werror]
 #define SYS_pkey_mprotect 386

In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31,
                 from ../include/utils.h:47,
                 from ../include/pkeys.h:12,
                 from pkey_exec_prot.c:18:
/usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 # define SYS_pkey_mprotect __NR_pkey_mprotect
Aha, that explains why redefining gives us an error, because we're
defining it to the literal 386 whereas the system header is defining it
to the __NR value.

Is there a reason to use the SYS_ name?

Typically we just use the __NR value directly, and that would avoid any
problems with redefinition I think, as long as we're using the same
value as the system header (which we always should be).

eg:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
index 6ba95039a034..3312cb1b058d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@
 
 #define SI_PKEY_OFFSET	0x20
 
-#define SYS_pkey_mprotect	386
-#define SYS_pkey_alloc		384
-#define SYS_pkey_free		385
+#define __NR_pkey_mprotect	386
+#define __NR_pkey_alloc		384
+#define __NR_pkey_free		385
 
 #define PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY	2
 #define NR_PKEYS		32
@@ -62,17 +62,17 @@ void pkey_set_rights(int pkey, unsigned long rights)
 
 int sys_pkey_mprotect(void *addr, size_t len, int prot, int pkey)
 {
-	return syscall(SYS_pkey_mprotect, addr, len, prot, pkey);
+	return syscall(__NR_pkey_mprotect, addr, len, prot, pkey);
 }
 
 int sys_pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long rights)
 {
-	return syscall(SYS_pkey_alloc, flags, rights);
+	return syscall(__NR_pkey_alloc, flags, rights);
 }
 
 int sys_pkey_free(int pkey)
 {
-	return syscall(SYS_pkey_free, pkey);
+	return syscall(__NR_pkey_free, pkey);
 }
 
 int pkeys_unsupported(void)

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help