Re: [merge] Build failure selftest/powerpc/mm/pkey_exec_prot
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2020-08-04 01:11:35
Sandipan Das [off-list ref] writes:
On 03/08/20 4:32 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
Sachin Sant [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
On 02-Aug-2020, at 10:58 PM, Sandipan Das [off-list ref] wrote: On 02/08/20 4:45 pm, Sachin Sant wrote:quoted
pkey_exec_prot test from linuxppc merge branch (3f68564f1f5a) fails to build due to following error: gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Werror -DGIT_VERSION='"v5.8-rc7-1276-g3f68564f1f5a"' -I/home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include -m64 pkey_exec_prot.c /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h ../harness.c ../utils.c -o /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/pkey_exec_prot In file included from pkey_exec_prot.c:18: /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:34: error: "SYS_pkey_mprotect" redefined [-Werror] #define SYS_pkey_mprotect 386 In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:31, from /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/utils.h:47, from /home/sachin/linux/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h:12, from pkey_exec_prot.c:18: /usr/include/bits/syscall.h:1583: note: this is the location of the previous definition # define SYS_pkey_mprotect __NR_pkey_mprotect commit 128d3d021007 introduced this error. selftests/powerpc: Move pkey helpers to headers Possibly the # defines for sys calls can be retained in pkey_exec_prot.c orI am unable to reproduce this on the latest merge branch (HEAD at f59195f7faa4). I don't see any redefinitions in pkey_exec_prot.c either.I can still see this problem on latest merge branch. I have following gcc version gcc version 8.3.1 20191121What libc version? Or just the distro & version?Sachin observed this on RHEL 8.2 with glibc-2.28. I couldn't reproduce it on Ubuntu 20.04 and Fedora 32 and both these distros are using glibc-2.31.
OK odd. Usually it's newer glibc that hits this problem. I guess on RHEL 8.2 we're getting the asm-generic version? But that would be quite wrong if that's what's happening. cheers