Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 11 authors, 2020-07-26

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] module: Rename module_alloc() to text_alloc() and move to kernel proper

From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2020-07-14 19:32:10
Also in: linux-riscv

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:19:24PM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
quoted
So perhaps the answer is to have text_alloc() not with a 'where'
argument but with a 'why' argument. Or more simply, just have separate
alloc/free APIs for each case, with generic versions that can be
overridden by the architecture.
Well, there only seem to be 2 cases here, either the pointer needs to
fit in some immediate displacement, or not.

On x86 we seem have the advantage of a fairly large immediate
displacement as compared to many other architectures (due to our
variable sized instructions). And thus have been fairly liberal with our
usage of it (also our indirect jmps/calls suck, double so with
RETCH-POLINE).

Still, the indirect jump, as mentioned by Russel should work for
arbitrarily placed code for us too.


So I'm thinking that something like:

enum ptr_type {
	immediate_displacement,
	absolute,
};

void *text_alloc(unsigned long size, enum ptr_type type)
{
	unsigned long vstart = VMALLOC_START;
	unsigned long vend   = VMALLOC_END;

	if (type == immediate_displacement) {
		vstart = MODULES_VADDR;
		vend   = MODULES_END;
	}

	return __vmalloc_node_range(size, TEXT_ALIGN, vstart, vend,
				    GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, 0,
				    NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_);
}

void text_free(void *ptr)
{
	vfree(ptr);
}
Beware, however, that on 32-bit ARM, if module PLTs are enabled,
we will try to place the module in the module region (which gives
best performance) but if that allocation fails, we will fall back
to placing it in the vmalloc region and using PLTs.

So, for a module allocation, we would need to make up to two calls
to text_alloc(), once with "immediate_displacement", and if that
fails and we have PLT support enabled, again with "absolute".

Hence, as other people have said, why module_alloc() would need to
stay separate.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help