On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
If function callers and providers do not share the same prototypes the
compiler complains of missing prototypes. Fix this by moving the
already existing prototypes out to a mutually convenient location.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:109:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘check_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
109 | int check_astate(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:114:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘restore_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
114 | void restore_astate(int cpu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cc: Olof Johansson <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pasemi.h | 15 ------------
Is there no sane way we can include this file directly to the cpufreq
file ?
arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/powersave.S | 2 ++
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 1 +
include/linux/platform_data/pasemi.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/pasemi.h
--
viresh