Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] implement KASLR for powerpc/fsl_booke/64
From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Date: 2020-03-04 21:26:09
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 18:16 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi Jason,quoted
This is a try to implement KASLR for Freescale BookE64 which is based on my earlier implementation for Freescale BookE32: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=131718 The implementation for Freescale BookE64 is similar as BookE32. One difference is that Freescale BookE64 set up a TLB mapping of 1G during booting. Another difference is that ppc64 needs the kernel to be 64K-aligned. So we can randomize the kernel in this 1G mapping and make it 64K-aligned. This can save some code to creat another TLB map at early boot. The disadvantage is that we only have about 1G/64K = 16384 slots to put the kernel in. KERNELBASE 64K |--> kernel <--| | | | +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | | |....| | | | | | | | | |....| | | +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | 1G |-----> offset <-----| kernstart_virt_addr I'm not sure if the slot numbers is enough or the design has any defects. If you have some better ideas, I would be happy to hear that. Thank you all.Are you making any attempt to hide kernel address leaks in this series? I've just been looking at the stackdump code just now, and it directly prints link registers and stack pointers, which is probably enough to determine the kernel base address: SPs: LRs: %pS pointer [ 0.424506] [c0000000de403970] [c000000001fc0458] dump_stack+0xfc/0x154 (unreliable) [ 0.424593] [c0000000de4039c0] [c000000000267eec] panic+0x258/0x5ac [ 0.424659] [c0000000de403a60] [c0000000024d7a00] mount_block_root+0x634/0x7c0 [ 0.424734] [c0000000de403be0] [c0000000024d8100] prepare_namespace+0x1ec/0x23c [ 0.424811] [c0000000de403c60] [c0000000024d7010] kernel_init_freeable+0x804/0x880 git grep \\\"REG\\\" arch/powerpc shows a few other uses like this, all in process.c or in xmon. Maybe replacing the REG format string in KASLR mode would be sufficient?
Whatever we decide to do here, it's not book3e-specific so it should be considered separately from these patches. -Scott