On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 16:14 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 02/02/2020 à 12:26, Qian Cai a écrit :
quoted
quoted
On Jan 30, 2020, at 9:13 AM, Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:
config DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
bool "Debug arch page table for semantics compliance" if ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE || EXPERT
depends on MMU
default 'n' if !ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
default 'y' if DEBUG_VM
Does it really necessary to potentially force all bots to run this? Syzbot, kernel test robot etc? Does it ever pay off for all their machine times there?
Machine time ?
On a 32 bits powerpc running at 132 MHz, the tests takes less than 10ms.
Is it worth taking the risk of not detecting faults by not selecting it
by default ?
The risk is quite low as Catalin mentioned this thing is not to detect
regressions but rather for arch/mm maintainers.
I do appreciate the efforts to get everyone as possible to run this thing,
so it get more notices once it is broken. However, DEBUG_VM seems like such
a generic Kconfig those days that have even been enabled by default for
Fedora Linux, so I would rather see a more sensitive default been taken
even though the test runtime is fairly quickly on a small machine for now.
[ 5.656916] debug_vm_pgtable: debug_vm_pgtable: Validating
architecture page table helpers
[ 5.665661] debug_vm_pgtable: debug_vm_pgtable: Validated
architecture page table helpers