Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Rename mhp_restrictions to mhp_modifiers
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-08 19:00:03
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-s390, linux-sh, lkml, platform-driver-x86
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:17 AM Logan Gunthorpe [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2020-01-08 5:28 a.m., David Hildenbrand wrote:quoted
On 07.01.20 21:59, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:quoted
The mhp_restrictions struct really doesn't specify anything resembling a restriction anymore so rename it to be mhp_modifiers.I wonder if something like "mhp_params" would be even better. It's essentially just a way to avoid changing call chains rough-out all archs whenever we want to add a new parameter.Sure, that does sound a bit nicer to me. I can change it for v3.
Oh, I was just about to chime in to support "modifiers" because I would expect all parameters to folded into a "params" struct. The modifiers seem to be limited to the set of items that are only considered in a non-default / expert memory hotplug use cases.