On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:35 PM Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:34:54AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
quoted
quoted
1b2a1e63 Pingfan Liu 2018-06-25 243 }
1b2a1e63 Pingfan Liu 2018-06-25 244 }
1b2a1e63 Pingfan Liu 2018-06-25 @245 BUG_ON(!ret);
If the list is empty then "ret" can be unitialized. We test a different
list "dev->links.suppliers" to see if that's empty. I wrote a bunch of
code to make Smatch try to understand about empty lists, but I don't
think it works...
Yes, if list_empty, then the code can not touch ret. But ret is
useless in this scene. Does it matter?
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking? Of course, it matters?
Oh, I misunderstood your original comment. Yes, you are right. I will
fix it in next version, if this code section is still used.
Thanks and regards,
Pingfan