Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2018-06-28

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/base: introduce some help routines for reordering a group of dev

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2018-06-25 06:41:18
Also in: linux-pci, lkml

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:23:05PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch introduce some help routines used by next patch. It aims to
ease reviewing, while the next patch will concentrate on algorithm.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Young <redacted>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <redacted>
---
 drivers/base/core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 36622b5..8113d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -123,6 +123,44 @@ static int device_is_dependent(struct device *dev, void *target)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct pos_info {
+	struct device *pos;
+	struct device *tail;
+};
+
+/* caller takes the devices_kset->list_lock */
+static int descendants_reorder_after_pos(struct device *dev,
+	void *data)
+{
+	struct device *pos;
+	struct pos_info *p = data;
+
+	pos = p->pos;
+	pr_debug("devices_kset: Moving %s after %s\n",
+		 dev_name(dev), dev_name(pos));
+	device_for_each_child(dev, p, descendants_reorder_after_pos);
+	/* children at the tail */
+	list_move(&dev->kobj.entry, &pos->kobj.entry);
+	/* record the right boundary of the section */
+	if (p->tail == NULL)
+		p->tail = dev;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* iterate over an open section */
+#define list_opensect_for_each_reverse(cur, left, right)	\
+	for (cur = right->prev; cur == left; cur = cur->prev)
+
+static bool is_consumer(struct device *query, struct device *supplier)
+{
+	struct device_link *link;
+	/* todo, lock protection */
+	list_for_each_entry(link, &supplier->links.consumers, s_node)
+		if (link->consumer == query)
+			return true;
+	return false;
+}
You are adding code that no one uses yet, making this impossible to
review as I don't know what to expect.  I shouldn't have to read the
second patch and have to flip back and forth to try to figure it out :(

sorry, please break this series up in a better way to make it simpler to
review.

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help