RE: [PATCHv4 1/3] ARMv8: dts: ls1046a: add the property of IB and OB
From: Leo Li <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-10 21:20:39
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I [mailto:kishon@ti.com] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 12:22 AM To: Xiaowei Bao <redacted>; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com; will.deacon@arm.com; bhelgaas@google.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Madalin-cristian Bucur [off-list ref]; Sumit Garg [off-list ref]; Y.b. Lu [off-list ref]; hongtao.jia@nxp.com; Andy Tang [off-list ref]; Leo Li [off-list ref]; jingoohan1@gmail.com; pbrobinson@gmail.com; songxiaowei@hisilicon.com; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Z.q. Hou [off-list ref]; Mingkai Hu [off-list ref]; M.h. Lian [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/3] ARMv8: dts: ls1046a: add the property of IB an=
d OB
=20 Hi Bao, =20 On Friday 10 November 2017 09:18 AM, Bao Xiaowei wrote:quoted
Add the property of inbound and outbound windows number for ep driver. Signed-off-by: Bao Xiaowei <redacted> Acked-by: Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com> --- v2: - no change v3: - modify the commit message v4: - no change arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)=20 $subject should start with something like arm64: dts: ls1046a: **quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsib/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi index 06b5e12d04d8..f8332669663c 100644--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi@@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ device_type =3D "pci"; dma-coherent; num-lanes =3D <4>; + num-ib-windows =3D <6>; + num-ob-windows =3D <6>;=20 EP specific properties shouldn't be added in RC dt node. Ideally you shou=
ld have
a separate dt node for RC and EP.
It is a single PCIe controller which can be configured to either RC mode or= EP mode. Wouldn't it conflict with the device tree principles to have two= device tree nodes for the same PCIe controller? And obviously the two mod= es cannot be used at the same time so we cannot have two drivers both probe= on the same hardware. Regards, Leo