Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping]
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-06-21 14:34:16
Also in:
lkml
Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:19:11PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 14:48:29 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:quoted
Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:quoted
On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:quoted
Hi Millian, can I take this as an Acked-by or Tested-by?I have no access to any PowerPC hardware. In principle the code looks fine, but that's all I can say here.Ok, that would count as an Acked-by, i.e. from Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: ------------------------- Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me" into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an explicit ack). ------------------------- If you had a ppc machine _and_ had applied and tested the patch, that would allow us to use a Tested-by tag.I see, I'm still unfamiliar with this process. But yes, do consider it an `Acked-by` from my side then.
Right, then there is another tag there that is relevant to this discussion: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496312681-20133-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com which will has the Message-ID of the message with this patch, embedded in a URL that when clicked will bring you to the thread where the patch was submitted and the acks, tested-by, reviewed-by, etc were provided, so that we can go back and check the history of the patch. - Arnaldo