Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping]
From: Mark Wielaard <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-15 11:16:41
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:46 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
Just a quick question: Have you guys applied my recent patch:
=20
commit 5ea0416f51cc93436bbe497c62ab49fd9cb245b6
Author: Milian Wolff [off-list ref]
Date: Thu Jun 1 23:00:21 2017 +0200
=20
perf report: Include partial stacks unwound with libdw
=20
So far the whole stack was thrown away when any error occurred before
the maximum stack depth was unwound. This is actually a very common
scenario though. The stacks that got unwound so far are still
interesting. This removes a large chunk of differences when comparing
perf script output for libunwind and libdw perf unwinding.
=20
If not, then this could explain the issue you are seeing.Thanks! No, I didn't have that patch (*) yet. It makes a huge difference. With that, Paolo's patch and the elfutils libdw powerpc64 fallback unwinder patch, it looks like I get user stack traces for everything now on ppc64le. Cheers, Mark (*) It just this one-liner, but what a difference that makes:
--- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int unwind__get_entries(unwind_entry_cb_t cb, void *arg=,
=20
err =3D dwfl_getthread_frames(ui->dwfl, thread->tid, frame_callback=
, ui);
=20
- if (err && !ui->max_stack)
+ if (err && ui->max_stack !=3D max_stack)
err =3D 0;
=20
/*