Re: RFC: better timer interface
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-22 19:25:15
Also in:
linux-s390, lkml
On Mon, 22 May 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
But it's easy enough to provide them. All we need for that is something like unsigned long time_msec; which gets incremented every tick by the appropriate amount of milliseconds. Having that would also allow to replace all the end = jiffies + msec_to_jiffies(xxx); while (time_before(jiffies, end)) .... constructs with a milliseconds based machinery. So we can remove all *_to_jiffies() interfaces over time.A lot of those users could probably just ktime_get()/ktime_before() here, as they would by definition not be performance critical.
Right.
I don't see a way to just tk->tkr_mono.base but with a ktime_get_coarse() we could just return the ktime_t of the last tick and not even need a seqlock on 64-bit architectures, or have to introduce a new API.
Yeah, that would be possible, but OTOH, for those loop thingies it probably does not matter at all whether you have the overhead of ktime_get() or not. We need to look at that stuff deeper. Thanks, tglx