Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 7 authors, 2017-04-21

Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node lifecyle

From: Frank Rowand <hidden>
Date: 2017-04-20 05:13:41
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On 04/19/17 21:43, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 04/19/17 16:27, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
quoted
On 04/18/2017 06:31 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
< snip >
quoted
To get that same info as far as I know is to add a dump_stack() after
each pr_debug.
Here is a patch that I have used.  It is not as user friendly in terms
of human readable stack traces (though a very small user space program
should be able to fix that).  The patch is cut and pasted into this
email, so probably white space damaged.
< snip >
+
+	if (node) {
+		int k;
+		int refcount = refcount_read(&node->kobj.kref.refcount);
+		pr_err("XXX get 0x%p %3d [0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx] ",
+			node, refcount,
If this was a real patch, meant for people other than myself, the
pr_err() would instead be pr_debug().

-Frank

< snip >
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help