Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node lifecyle
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2017-04-19 02:49:59
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2017-04-19 02:49:59
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:42:32 -0700 Frank Rowand [off-list ref] wrote:
And of course the other issue with using tracepoints is the extra space required to hold the tracepoint info. With the pr_debug() approach, the space usage can be easily removed for a production kernel via a config option.
Now if you are saying you want to be able to enable debugging without the tracing infrastructure I would agree. As the tracing infrastructure is large. But I'm working on shrinking it more.
Tracepoints are wonderful technology, but not always the proper tool to use for debug info.
But if you are going to have tracing enabled regardless, adding a few more tracepoints isn't going to make the difference. -- Steve
quoted
If Rob wants to convert printk() style data to trace data (and I can't convince him otherwise) then I will have further comments on this specific patch.