Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 7 authors, 2017-04-21

Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node lifecyle

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2017-04-19 02:49:59
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:42:32 -0700
Frank Rowand [off-list ref] wrote:
And of course the other issue with using tracepoints is the extra space
required to hold the tracepoint info.  With the pr_debug() approach, the
space usage can be easily removed for a production kernel via a config
option.
Now if you are saying you want to be able to enable debugging without
the tracing infrastructure I would agree. As the tracing infrastructure
is large. But I'm working on shrinking it more.
Tracepoints are wonderful technology, but not always the proper tool to
use for debug info.
But if you are going to have tracing enabled regardless, adding a few
more tracepoints isn't going to make the difference.

-- Steve
quoted
If Rob wants to convert printk() style data to trace data (and I can't
convince him otherwise) then I will have further comments on this specific
patch.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help