Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type
From: Jin, Yao <hidden>
Date: 2017-04-11 11:38:01
Also in:
lkml
On 4/11/2017 4:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:quoted
On 4/11/2017 3:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
This is still a completely inadequate changelog. I really will not accept patches like this.Hi, The changelog is added in the cover-letter ("[PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Show branch type"). Does the changelog need to be added in each patch's description? That's fine, I can add and resend this patch.The cover letter is not retained; it is throw away information. Each patch should have a coherent changelog that explain why the patch was done and explain non trivial things in the implementation. Simply copy/pasting the same story in multiple patches is not right either, for the simple fact that the patches were not the same. You did a different thing, so you need a different story.
Thanks so much for the suggestion! I accept this and decide to make changes on my patch description. Maybe not adding a full change-log, I will add a section in patch description to describe the major changes from previous version. Thanks Jin Yao