Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2017-04-11

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type

From: Jin, Yao <hidden>
Date: 2017-04-11 11:38:01
Also in: lkml


On 4/11/2017 4:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
quoted
On 4/11/2017 3:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
This is still a completely inadequate changelog. I really will not
accept patches like this.
Hi,

The changelog is added in the cover-letter ("[PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Show branch type").

Does the changelog need to be added in each patch's description?

That's fine, I can add and resend this patch.
The cover letter is not retained; it is throw away information.

Each patch should have a coherent changelog that explain why the patch
was done and explain non trivial things in the implementation.

Simply copy/pasting the same story in multiple patches is not right
either, for the simple fact that the patches were not the same. You did
a different thing, so you need a different story.

Thanks so much for the suggestion!

I accept this and decide to make changes on my patch description. Maybe 
not adding a full change-log, I will add a section in patch description 
to describe the major changes from previous version.

Thanks
Jin Yao
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help