Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2017-02-23 17:55:05
Also in:
alsa-devel, amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-alpha, linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linux-fbdev, linux-ide, linux-input, linux-media, linux-omap, linux-scsi, linux-sh, lkml, netdev, nouveau, platform-driver-x86, sparclinux
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 17:41 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 23 February 2017 at 17:18, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older pr_warning in the kernel source tree. Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is not used in tools/. Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing.[]quoted
Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in?After all of these actually get applied, and maybe a cycle or two later, one would get sent.By which point you'll get a few reincarnation of it. So you'll have to do the same exercise again :-(
Maybe to one or two files. Not a big deal.
I guess the question is - are you expecting to get the series merged all together/via one tree ?
No. The only person that could do that effectively is Linus.
If not, your plan is perfectly reasonable.