On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 17:41 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:

On 23 February 2017 at 17:18, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older
pr_warning in the kernel source tree.

Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files.

This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate
define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is
not used in tools/.

Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing.

[]

quoted

Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in?

After all of these actually get applied,
and maybe a cycle or two later, one would
get sent.

By which point you'll get a few reincarnation of it. So you'll have to
do the same exercise again :-(

Maybe to one or two files.  Not a big deal.

I guess the question is - are you expecting to get the series merged
all together/via one tree ?

No.  The only person that could do that effectively is Linus.

If not, your plan is perfectly reasonable.