On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 19:04 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
If we don't have an interrupt-map on a PCI controller, why don't we
instead log a message regarding that being missing, and give up
early?
Why ? It's legit to not support LSIs.
That sounds like a more generically useful error message; it's also
possible that a DT author simply forgot to add the map, and the
platform has suitable interrupts wired up.
But it's not necessarily an error...
quoted
This patch introduces a different message for this specific case,
and it also reduces the level of the message from error to warning.
Before this patch, when an adapter was plugged in a slot without
Level
quoted
interrupts capabilities, we saw generic error messages like this:
[54.239] pci 002d:70:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci() failed with rc=-
22
quoted
Now, with this applied, we see the following specific message:
[19.947] pci 0014:60:00.0: of_irq_parse_pci() gave up. The slot
of this
quoted
device has no Level-triggered Interrupts capability.
Following my above example, this has gone from opaque to potentially
misleading
I'm not sure. At least for some of our platforms this is the correct
message :-) Our Hypervisor doesn't allow LSIs on some slots.
I think it's not that misleading. It's obvious something is wrong with
LSIs, which you can easily figure out from there.
Cheers,
Ben.