Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 3 authors, 2016-03-31

Re: [PATCH] Remove kretprobe_trampoline_holder.

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2016-03-30 00:09:04

On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 15:34 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29 März 2016, 10:45:57 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
quoted
On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 17:29 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
quoted
If I do s/_do_fork/._do_fork/ in kprobe_ftrace.tc then all ftrace kprobe
tests pass:
OK. We fixed that in 'perf probe', but not if you're using the sysfs file
directly.

Do you want to write a patch for ftracetest to try and handle it? I guess
you'd try "_do_fork" and if that fails then try "._do_fork", and maybe
only if uname -m says you're running on ppc64?
I did write a patch yesterday (included below for reference), but then I
noticed that the other ftrace tests use _do_fork and they work fine (I guess
because of the fix you mentioned). I think that ideally the ftrace filter
mechanism should work with dot symbols as well as regular symbols.

I think this could work by creating a mechanism analogous to the
ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_MATCH_SYM_NAME one in trace_syscalls.c. Ftrace_match_record
could call it to adjust the symbol name (like kprobe_lookup_name) before
calling ftrace_match.

But I’m wondering if it’s really worth the effort and maybe patching the
testcase is enough? Also, I don’t know whether my idea would have any
side effects.
It'd be nice if it worked properly. Reusing kprobe_lookup_name() looks like it
would be the right fix, given this is "kprobe events".

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help