On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 09:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 15:04 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
quoted
=20
static int nr_chips;
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, chip_id);
=20
/*
* Note: The set of pstates consists of contiguous integers, the
@@ -317,9 +318,7 @@ static void powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check(void
*data)
=20
pmsr =3D get_pmspr(SPRN_PMSR);
=20
- for (i =3D 0; i < nr_chips; i++)
- if (chips[i].id =3D=3D cpu_to_chip_id(cpu))
- break;
+ i =3D this_cpu_read(chip_id);
=20
Except it's not a chip_id, so your patch confused me for a good 2mn
...
Call it chip_idx maybe ? ie, index.
Yeah, it was a badly named variable but I changed it even more and
Shilpasri rebased it here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/599523/
Mikey