Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 4 authors, 2016-02-26

Re: [PATCH 06/12] powerpc/module: Rework is_early_mcount_callsite()

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2016-02-25 10:28:37
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:39 +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
On 25/02/16 01:28, Michael Ellerman wrote:
quoted
is_early_mcount_callsite() needs to detect either the two instruction or
the three instruction versions of the _mcount() sequence.

But if we're running a kernel with the two instruction sequence, we need
to be careful not to read instruction - 2, otherwise we might fall off
the front of a page and cause an oops.

While we're here convert to bool to make the return semantics clear.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Do we even need to do this anymore?
Yes. Otherwise the code in apply_relocate_add() will see a far call with no nop
slot after it to do the toc restore, and it considers that a bug (which it
usually is, except mcount is special).

As we discussed today I'm hoping we can clean this code up a bit more in the
medium term, but this works for now.

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help