Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2015-11-10 00:29:40
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 12:35 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 07/11/2015 00:24, Scott Wood a écrit :quoted
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 23:22 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:quoted
Le 06/11/2015 22:09, Scott Wood a écrit :quoted
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:quoted
When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel on a ppc64 host. VDSO64L fails: VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the first object as output format. As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the VDSO objects.quoted
So at this point, I can: 1- either fix my compiler, 2- or fix the vdso64 linker command.Thank you Scott. With the help of the comment from Segher, I can choose #1 now :)
What distro/toolchain did you hit this on? I actually wrote this same patch a while back, but from memory it broke in some configurations. So I never merged it. I'll see if I can find my notes and work out exactly why it didn't work, maybe we should merge it anyway, even though the real bug is a toolchain bug. cheers