Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-06 21:10:05
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
When I try to cross compile a ppc64 kernel, it generally fails on the VDSO stage. This is true for powerpc64 cross- compiler, but also when I try to build a ppc64le kernel on a ppc64 host. VDSO64L fails: VDSO64L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/vdso64.so.dbg /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.o: file class ELFCLASS64 incompatible with ELFCLASS32 /usr/bin/powerpc64-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File in wrong format This fails because gcc calls "collect2" with "--oformat elf32-powerpcle" with ppc64 objects, without the "--oformat" ld works well because it use the format of the first object as output format. As this case is correctly managed to build the other kernel objects, this patch replaces $(GCC) by $(LD) to generate the VDSO objects.
I cross-compile ppc64 kernels and have not seen this problem. I do need to pass in -m64 as part of $(CC) if it's not the toolchain default, which is not nice, but the proper fix for that is to add -m64 in the makefiles -- and if I don't it fails way before VDSO. Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case versus the other? -Scott