Re: memcpy regression
From: Michal Sojka <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-06 21:01:27
Subsystem:
linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest · Maintainers:
Madhavan Srinivasan, Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Sep 06 2015, Michal Sojka wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06 2015, christophe leroy wrote:quoted
Le 05/09/2015 02:08, Michal Sojka a =C3=A9crit :quoted
On 4.9.2015 21:49, Michal Sojka wrote:quoted
On 4.9.2015 20:10, christophe leroy wrote:quoted
Le 04/09/2015 16:35, Michal Sojka a =C3=A9crit :quoted
On Fri, Sep 04 2015, Christophe LEROY wrote:quoted
Le 04/09/2015 15:33, Michal Sojka a =C3=A9crit :quoted
Dear Christophe, my MPC5200-based system stopped booting recently. I bisected the=20 problem to your commit below. If I revert that commit (on top of 807249d3ada1ff28a47c4054ca4edd479421b671 =3D v4.2-6663-g807249d), =
my
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
system boots again.Do you use mainline code only, or do you have home-made code ?I use mainline only sources with non-mainline device-tree.quoted
memcpy() is not supposed to be used on non-cacheable memory. memcpy_toio() is the function to use when copying to non-cacheble=20 area. When I submitted the patch, I looked for erroneous use of memcpy()=
=20
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
and memset(). I found one wrong use of memset() that I changed to memset_io() but=
I
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
didn't find any misuse of memcpy(). But I may have missed one.I attach my .config, if it helps. I have there CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx=3Dy CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_SIMPLE=3Dy so arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx is probably the directory to look.=20 Do you see any mempcy misuse there?I only found one suspect use of memcpy() in=20 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/ It is in mpc52xx_pm.c but it's linked to CONFIG_PM which is not=20 selected by your .config I'll check in the drivers selected by your .config In parallele, are you able to try with CONFIG_PPC_EARLY_DEBUG in=20 order to try and locate the blocking point ?I don't get any output from the system even with CONFIG_PPC_EARLY_DEBU=
G.
quoted
quoted
Hmm, there is no udbg console for MPC5200. I hacked something up and=20 the earliest place I was able to initialize it is after=20 early_init_devtree() in setup_32.c. Even with this console, I got no=20 output when the problematic patch was applied. So the problem is=20 somewhere earlier.In early_init() in setup_32.c, there is the following comment: /* First zero the BSS -- use memset_io, some platforms don't have caches=
=20
quoted
on yet */ In that case, when does cache get activated ? In move_device_tree(), called from early_init_devtree(), there is a call=
=20
quoted
to memcpy(). Can you try replacing it by memcpy_io() ?I tried replacing it by memcpy_toio(), memcpy_fromio() and by generic_memcpy(). Nothing helped :(
I found the problem. The compiler replaces an assignment with a call to
memcpy. The following patch fixes the problem for me. However, I'm not
sure whether this is the real solution. I guess the compiler is free to
generate a call to memcpy wherever it wants so other compilers or other
optimization levels may need fixes at other places. What do others
think?
-Michal
---------------8<----------------------
From: Michal Sojka <redacted>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:44:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix unbootable system after memcpy optimization
This fixes the problem caused by commit
0b05e2d671c40cfb57e66e4e402320d6e056b2f8. On MPC5200, when using the
following version of GCC:
powerpc-603e-linux-gnu-gcc (OSELAS.Toolchain-2012.12.1) 4.7.2
the system was ubootable.
Signed-off-by: Michal Sojka <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
index 7d80bfd..c2f1fba 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c@@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec * __init setup_cpu_spec(unsign=ed long offset, old =3D *t; =20 /* Copy everything, then do fixups */ - *t =3D *s; + memcpy_toio(t, s, sizeof(struct cpu_spec)); =20 /* * If we are overriding a previous value derived from the real --=20 2.5.0