Re: bit fields && data tearing
From: Peter Hurley <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-09 11:18:32
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, lkml
From: Peter Hurley <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-09 11:18:32
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, lkml
On 09/08/2014 03:17 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
quoted
quoted
I think the whole "removing Alpha EV5" support is basically bonkers. Just use set_bit in the tty layer. Alpha will continue to work as well as it always has done and you won't design out support for any future processor that turns out not to do byte aligned stores. AlanIs *that* what we are talking about? I was added to this conversation in the middle where it had already generalized, so I had no idea. -hpaYes there are some flags in the tty layer that are vulnerable to this (although they've been vulnerable to it and missing a lock since last century with no known ill effects).
That observation cuts both ways; I'm willing to leave it vulnerable with 'no known ill effects' on the Alpha.