Re: bit fields && data tearing
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 20:49:29
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, lkml
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 20:49:29
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, lkml
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:34:52PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:quoted
On 09/05/2014 01:14 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:quoted
Here's how I read the two statements. First, the commit message: "It [this commit] documents that CPUs [supported by the Linux kernel] _must provide_ atomic one-byte and two-byte naturally aligned loads and stores." Second, in the body of the document: "The Linux kernel no longer supports pre-EV56 Alpha CPUs, because these older CPUs _do not provide_ atomic one-byte and two-byte loads and stores."Does this apply in general or only to SMP configurations? I guess non-SMP configurations would still have problems if interrupted in the wrong place...And preemption could cause problems, too. So I believe that it needs to be universal.
Well preemption is usually caused by an interrupt, except you have a combined load and preempt instruction :) Thanks, tglx